VELUM – Vehicle Envelope with Lightweight Ultrafilm
for Minimal Leakage

Introduction

This page complements a journal paper (submitted) on VELUM, a lightweight coated low-density polyethylene (LDPE) membrane for small lighter-than-air (SLTA) vehicles. It provides extra visuals and brief highlights only.

Conventional envelopes present trade-offs: polyurethane (PU) is durable yet heavy and more permeable, whereas Mylar® is light and gas-tight but brittle. The proposed coated LDPE reduces mass and leakage and improves tear tolerance while retaining simple, scalable fabrication.

Velum Airship
Figure: Velum Airship.

Manufacturing Concept

Envelopes of identical geometry were made from different materials: LDPE was built in our lab, while PU and Mylar® came from industrial manufacturers. Mylar was later excluded due to brittleness, so comparisons focused on LDPE versus PU.

Cutting LDPE panels
Figure: Cutting of LDPE panels for the VELUM envelope.
Sealing LDPE panels
Figure: Sealing of LDPE panels for the VELUM envelope.

Coating

Multiple tests were performed on small LDPE samples to identify the most effective coating method. The selected method, detailed in the paper, achieved superior surface coverage and was applied to the final envelope, thereby improving gas retention and durability.

Cutting LDPE panels
Figure: VELUM envelope coating.
Coating — Mini VELUM envelope
Coating — Main VELUM envelope.

Tests & Results

Just a brief overview is presented here; the full data and methods are detailed in the submitted paper.

  • Weight: Coated LDPE remained lighter than PU, with only a minor mass increase after coating.
  • Durability: Tear resistance higher than Mylar; seam strength remained reliable under stress.
  • Leakage: Lowest leakage-to-mass ratio among all three materials tested.
  • Hydrophobicity: Highest water-repellency (contact angle >117°).
  • Burst test: LDPE ruptured in a controlled slit (safe failure), PU failed at lower pressure, Mylar failed explosively.

Leakage test setup with the envelope suspended from a 50 N load cell in a controlled environment, as shown below:

Pillow-shaped sample
Mylar pillow leakage test
Sample on load cell
LDPE pillow leakage test
Pressure sensor setup
PU pillow leakage test

Burst tests (800×1200 mm samples; compressed air) replicated biaxial loading; Mylar carried the highest pressure before catastrophic rupture, PU failed first after ductile thinning, and LDPE ruptured at 3.08 kPa along a controlled slit—evidence of strong seams and a non-catastrophic failure mode (shown below).

Mylar Rupture
Mylar burst test
LDPE Rupture
LDPE burst test
PU Rupture
PU burst test

Deployment

To validate VELUM’s real-world feasibility, we conducted a deployment trial in a partially flooded cave environment, characterized by narrow passages and high humidity.

The coated LDPE envelope maintained helium retention and structural integrity during field tests, demonstrating stable flight and durability under harsh conditions.

Pre-Deployment Flight Tests

Bench and indoor flight trials to verify buoyancy, controls, sealing integrity, and handling before the cave mission.

LDPE Envelope

PU Envelope

Field Deployment in Cave Environment

Validation in a partially flooded cave with narrow passages and high humidity. The airship maintained stable flight, strong helium retention, and resilient handling in a confined setting.

Cave chamber view 1
Cave chamber view 2
Cave passage view 3
Cave passage view 4
Cave chamber view 5
Cave deployment from kayak
Cave still frame A
Cave still frame B
Cave still frame B